← Knowledge map

Controversies

Museums, collections and repatriation

Drums, masks, medicine bundles and ancestral remains sit in institutions that acquired them under conditions no one would accept today.

History

How collections were formed

Confiscation by missionaries and officials, purchase under duress, salvage collecting during epidemics and famine, and grave excavation all contributed to museum holdings.

Legal frameworks

NAGPRA (1990) in the United States, national repatriation policies in Australia and New Zealand, and case-by-case negotiation in Europe now govern returns — unevenly and slowly.

Restricted objects

Some items should not be displayed or photographed at all. Institutions increasingly accept community-set access conditions on their own collections.

Linked entries

One of 28 entries in the knowledge map. Evidence grades above describe the kind of claim being made, not its certainty on a single scale.